next up previous
Next: A more robust smoothness Up: Smoothness estimation Previous: Smoothness estimation


Smoothness a la SPM

The current implementations of SPM (SPM99) use the smoothness estimation as described in Kiebel et al [5].

For a Gaussian random field the smoothness is defined as $ W =
\vert\boldsymbol{\Lambda}\vert ^{-{1}/{2D}}$ where $ D$ is the dimensionality of the field and $ \boldsymbol{\Lambda}$ the covariance matrix of it's first partial derivatives. An unbiased estimator for the covariance of the partial derivatives is given by

$\displaystyle \hat{\lambda}_{jk} = \frac{\nu - 2}{(\nu - 1)N} \sum_{i}^{N} \fra...
...c{\partial S_{it}}{\partial x_j} \frac{\partial S_{it}} {\partial x_k} \right),$ (10)

where $ \nu$ is the number of degrees of freedom, $ N$ the number of voxel positions ($ i$) and $ M$ the number of time points ($ t$) in a FMRI time series. In fact we don't have to evaluate this equation for the whole covariance matrix. The off-diagonal elements will be zero so we only need to calculate the diagonal elements of $ \boldsymbol{\Lambda}$

$\displaystyle \hat{\lambda}_{jj} = \frac{\nu - 2}{(\nu - 1)N} \sum_{i}^{N} \frac{1}{M} \sum_{t}^{M} \left( \frac{\partial S_{it}}{\partial x_j} \right)^2.$ (11)

The partial derivative is evaluated via the gradient operator

$\displaystyle \nabla S_{i} = \frac{S_{i+} - S_{i-}}{2 \delta d},$ (12)

for non-edge voxels, where $ S_{i+}$ and $ S_{i-}$ are $ S_i$s neighbouring voxels in the dimension along which the derivative is currently being evaluated.

Now we can calculate the FWHM of the theoretical Gaussian responsible for the observed smoothness

$\displaystyle FWHM_i = \sqrt{8 \cdot ln (2) \cdot W_{ii}},$ (13)

where $ W_{ii}$ is the variance, $ \sigma^2$, of the Gaussian point-spread-function computed from the covariance measure for the $ i$th dimension

$\displaystyle W_{ii} = \frac{1}{2 \lambda_{ii}}.$ (14)

A combined value for the FWHM is given by the geometric mean of the various FWHM$ _i$

$\displaystyle FWHM = \left[\prod_{i=0}^{D}FWHM_i\right]^{1/D}.$ (15)


next up previous
Next: A more robust smoothness Up: Smoothness estimation Previous: Smoothness estimation
David Flitney 2001-11-29