Next: Acknowledgements
Up: Discussion
Previous: Robustness Study
In the case of accuracy we have shown that MCFLIRT optimisation
routines, cost functions and sinc interpolation consistently achieve
high levels of accuracy. In particular, the RMS test measure shows
that the error is typically around 0.1mm which is more than an order
of magnitude less than the voxel size of 4mm, but necessary to ensure
subsequent statistical analysis is valid. Furthermore, tests
demonstrated that the average performance of the MCFLIRT scheme was
superior to both SPM99 and AIR v3.08. Results of the tests using real
data that contained activation, where the underlying ``ground truth''
was not known and the RMS measure could not be used, were inconclusive
due to the presence of (an unknown amount of) physiologically induced
intensity variations.
Note that in all cases (for the robustness and accuracy studies) the
data sets used for comparative testing were independent of those used
to tune the empirical parameters of the methods used.
Early tests using synthetic data have revealed that in cases where the
motion is moderate (up to 2mm translation and 2 rotation),
the sequential initialisation (see Figure 6) scheme
yields an improvement in the accuracy of motion estimates compared to
one where no sequential initialisation is performed. Conversely, in
cases where the amplitude of motion parameters were known to be high,
there was no inherent disadvantage in making the assumption of an
underlying smooth motion trend across timepoints.
We would be interested to see how robustly the schemes perform over
time-series of varying length. If at all significant, we might expect
to see some impact on the MCFLIRT mean image registration scheme where
a longer time-series might provide a more general and robust template
image. At present there is no guaranteed advantage in using the mean
template in addition to the standard correction schedule but one would
expect it to play a more beneficial role in correcting extended
time-series exhibiting moderate to low motion artefacts.
The methods and results shown here are all for whole brain data sets,
although the algorithms have also been successfully adapted to work
with data sets containing very few slices (or just single slices) by
restricting the transformations to be two dimensional, as the
optimisation and apodizing methods also apply for these two
dimensional registrations. However, when general three dimensional
registration is required for images containing few slices, other
approaches need to be used, such as those employed by some of the
other packages tested here (where no global search is involved).
Practical registration packages usually require the setting of certain
parameter values. The methods introduced here also contain several
configurable parameters such as image resolutions for the various
optimisation stages. These values have been selected empirically,
over a wide range of data sets, to be as robust as possible for
general brain images. However, when dealing with particular data sets
these general settings may not be optimal and so most methods allow
these values to be changed, via configurable options. When using
other packages for comparitive studies we have tried to select the
best general parameter values (by consulting the appropriate
documentation) but recognise that further improvement upon these
results could be possible by careful selection of parameters. The
tuning of registration methods is, at present, an undesirable
necessity in many situations, which prevents easy automation. By
using more robust algorithms this tuning of parameter settings can
hopefully be minimised or avoided entirely.
In summary, the FLIRT and MCFLIRT packages are highly robust and
accurate, as has been demonstrated by the quantitative experiments and
by qualitative feedback. These methods have now been used to
satisfactorily solve thousands of registration problems, some using
extremely different imaging modalities. The binary and source code
distributions for the MCFLIRT and FLIRT packages are available for
downloading from www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl.
Next: Acknowledgements
Up: Discussion
Previous: Robustness Study
Peter Bannister
2002-05-03