Next: Inference
Up: Model
Previous: Model
Two-level GLM
Consider an experiment where there are
first-level sessions
and that for each first-level session,
, the preprocessed FMRI
data is a
vector
, the
design
matrix is
, and
is a
vector of
parameter estimates (
). The preprocessed FMRI
data,
, is assumed to have been
prewhitened (25,4). An individual GLM
relates first-level parameters to the
individual data sets:
 |
|
|
(1) |
where
. In this paper we
consider the variance components as unknown with the exception of
the first-level FMRI time-series autocorrelation. The residuals
are assumed to be prewhitened data and as a result
are uncorrelated. This inherently means that we assume that the
autocorrelation is known with no uncertainty, an assumption which
is commonly made in FMRI time-series
analysis (8,25,4). Note that the
first level design matrices,
, do not need to be the same for
all
.
Using the block diagonal forms, i.e. with
![$\displaystyle Y\! =\! \left[\! \begin{array}{c} Y_1 \\ Y_2 \\ \vdots \\ Y_{N_K}...
...begin{array}{c} \beta_1 \\ \beta_2 \\ \vdots \\ \beta_{N_K}
\end{array} \right]$](img20.png)
and
the two-level model is
where
is the
second-level design matrix
(e.g. separating controls from normals or modelling different
sessions for subjects),
is the
vector of
second-level parameters, and
and where
with
denoting the
diagonal form of first-level covariance matrices
.
We call
the random effects variance.
Next: Inference
Up: Model
Previous: Model