The parameters in the area of no interest can initially be divided into those in the null space of (associated with zero columns) and the remainder. All null parameters can be treated in the same way as null parameters formed from shapes of interest, and therefore need not be considered separately.

The remaining parameters all contribute towards the term. For small subshapes, each parameter contributes a small partial volume amount to a single image voxel. Consider the image voxel in the area of no interest, which is modelled by subshapes of equal size. Therefore each subshape contributes a partial volume amount of and is associated with a column in of the form: . Such a set of subshapes contains 1 effective parameter of no interest and effective degenerate parameters.

To see the degeneracy more clearly it is necessary to transform this set of parameters. Let this set of subshape parameters be with associated columns from . Furthermore, define a transformation where is an by matrix such that where . These matrices are

It is clear from this that the first parameter in the transformed set, , associated with the first column of , is the effective parameter of no interest and that all the others are null parameters. Consequently, the integration over this set of subshape parameters can be achieved using this reparameterisation. Note that this integration can be done separately for each measured voxel in the area of no interest, since the contributions to separate voxels are orthogonal in both the prior and posterior, which is the case for flat priors.

Applying this to the previously derived posterior gives:

where is equal to the number of measured voxels wholly inside the area of no interest; , and the submatrices are defined such that with .

The expression for is derived using that fact that the columns of and are all mutually orthogonal - that is, . This is true since only have non-zero entries in voxels inside the area of no interest.

This expression for the posterior is exactly the same form as previously derived (equation 7) without having an area of no interest. The difference between the two forms is that is replaced by and the residual operator removes signals related to both and , rather than just . As the signals spanned by are voxels in the area of no interest, of which there are , it is completely equivalent to ignoring these area completely - that is, by effectively removing them from the measured image and doing the analysis as if only voxels had been measured.

Finally, the total number of parameters used to model the area of no interest does not appear in the final posterior. Only the number of uninteresting parameters (equal to the number of measured voxels totally in the area of no interest) is important. Consequently, there is no limit on the number of subshapes which may be used to model area of interest, and the subshapes can become infinitesimal, justifying the implicit assumption that it is possible to treat subshapes as only ever contributing to one image voxel at a time, regardless of the spatial transformation, .

Note that a similar analysis applies to voxels which only partially cover the area of no interest. In this case, only subshapes will contribute towards the voxel intensity, such that and the non-null parameter becomes a pure partial volume parameter, with being the partial volume fraction. These will be treated in the next section.