Next: Random subject effect
Up: Multi-subject analysis with GLM
Previous: Multi-subject analysis with GLM
Firstly, we will rewrite the single-group study. One has for each
the GLM models:
 |
(30) |
with
and
. The case of auto-correlation
will be examined later on. It is rather straightforward to
recognise the fixed effect in the following model:
 |
(31) |
or
with obvious definitions for
,
and
with
.
One then derives easily the OLS for
which gives the vector
of the OLS's from each model (30):
![\begin{displaymath}\hat{\beta}= \left ( \begin{array}{c }
\hat{\beta_1} \\
...
...[1..n]}}^2)\otimes(^tXX)^-=diag(var(\hat{\beta}_i)_{[1..n]})
\end{displaymath}](img276.gif) |
(32) |
Note that if one assumes that
then:
![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{\sigma}_\epsilon^2=\frac{^t\epsilon\epsilon}{trace(P_{...
...nT-n rank(X)}=\overline{\hat{\sigma}_{{\epsilon_i}_{[1..n]}}^2}\end{displaymath}](img278.gif) |
(33) |
which is the pooled estimate of variances, then:
 |
(34) |
In either cases testing
, with
, where
is the contrast used on a
single model to assess the activation looked for, with the
statistic (19) will give the statistic used in
(4), and if
is a matrix (
) containing more than
one contrasts the
statistic (22) will be used.
Next: Random subject effect
Up: Multi-subject analysis with GLM
Previous: Multi-subject analysis with GLM
Didier Leibovici
2001-03-01